Temple Football Recruiting Central

One thing to note, this table is not easily viewed on mobile devices.

Recruit Name Position Rivals ESPN 247Sports* TAoD
Baines, ZaeWR☆ ☆ ☆, 5.6 ☆ ☆ ☆, 71 ☆ ☆ ☆, 81 ☆ ☆ ☆, 87
Clary, DyshierDE☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 70☆ ☆, 79 ☆ ☆ ☆, 83
Davis, SamOL☆ ☆ ☆, 5.5☆ ☆ ☆, 74☆ ☆ ☆, 85 ☆ ☆ ☆, 84
Duncan, MatthewQB☆ ☆, 5.4☆ ☆ ☆, 74☆ ☆ ☆, 82☆ ☆ ☆, 82
Longerbeam, Rob DB☆ ☆, 5.4☆ ☆ ☆, 75☆ ☆ ☆, 85☆ ☆ ☆, 84
Long, ChrisDB☆ ☆ ☆, 5.6 ☆ ☆ ☆, 76☆ ☆ ☆, 87☆ ☆ ☆, 84
McCargo, MuheemATH☆ ☆ ☆, 5.6 ☆ ☆ , 69 ☆ ☆, 79 ☆ ☆ ☆, 83
Morris, DemerickDT☆ ☆ ☆, 5.5☆ ☆ ☆, 71 ☆ ☆ ☆, 80☆ ☆ ☆, 87
Mujezinovic,
Liridon
OL☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 70 ☆ ☆, 79☆ ☆ , 78
Odom, AlexATH☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆, 69 ☆ ☆, 78☆ ☆, 79
Pena, TreborATH☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 75 ☆ ☆ ☆, 84 ☆ ☆ ☆, 89
Pesca, James LB☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 70 *NR(81 composite)☆ ☆, 77
Thoman, BryceOL☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 70 ☆ ☆ ☆ , 81☆ ☆ ☆, 80
Trask, ChevezDE☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 70 ☆ ☆ ☆,82 ☆ ☆, 77
Varner, Darian DT ☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 72 ☆ ☆ ☆, 82☆ ☆ ☆, 84
Wallace, ChazzDT☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 72 ☆ ☆ ☆ , 82 ☆ ☆ ☆, 86
Williams, GarrettDB ☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆, 69 *NR(80 composite)☆ ☆ ☆, 83
Woodbury, DJWR☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 72 *NR (82 composite)☆ ☆ ☆, 80
Zietek, MilesOL☆ ☆, 5.4 ☆ ☆ ☆, 73☆ ☆ ☆ , 83☆ ☆ ☆, 85

NR = not ranked numerically


Rivals Ratings formula explained


* 247Sports rankings explainednote, this is not the composite rating, this is 247Sports individual ratings. The composite score reflects ESPN and Rivals ratings, so there would be no point in posting those if I post the 247Composite.


ESPN rankings explained


TAoD = Temple Acres of Diamonds Ratings – based on my own film evaluation, camp reports and evaluations as well as projections from the industry recruiting rankings. Sort of a composite plus my own rating. Breakdown is as follows:

75-80: Legitimate FBS prospect, rotational player. With some development this player could become a starter by year 3 or 4. And there is nothing wrong with developmental contributors, every team needs one. Comparison: Zach Mesday

81-85: FBS prospect with P5 interest. If his development progresses appropriately, it could lead to starter role in 2-3 years time. Comparison: Linwood Crump

86-90: High level FBS prospect; One of the top 100 prospects at his position. Likely to contribute in years 1-2. Late round NFL potential. Could develop into All-AAC player. Comparison: Sean Chandler.

91-95: One of the top 50 prospects at his position in the country. Likely to contribute year 1 and mid-round NFL potential if he fully develops. Should be an All-AAC player. Comparison: Karamo Dioubate

96-100: Immediate playing potential and probably high NFL draft pick. One of the best in the entire country overall. Deemed to be a likely All-American. Comparison: None at Temple, it’s not what we do.


Here is another post that explains the 3 industry rating systems.